|
yusho-equivalents,
other times it’s two yusho-equivalents wrapped around a 12-3. At
the end of the day, it’s going to boil down to whatever the people on
the committee want. And with that, there’s no way to prevent
favoritism, racism, or just the fact that some of the members happen to
be in a bad mood on post-basho meeting day from becoming a part of the
equation. Here’s what the current system has given us so far. We have yokozuna like Futahaguro, without a yusho to his name – and Onokuni, with just two; yet there are two rikishi who weren’t promoted despite winning five yusho (one being promoted later in his career). Of the last 20 yokozuna, there have been three promoted with mere 12-3 records in the first basho of their yokozuna runs, and one who was promoted after only a 12-3 basho. We have rikishi promoted after two basho with a total of only 23 wins, while numerous rikishi were denied promotion despite winning as many as 26 and 27 What a mess! What happened to consistency? For now, I have one last point. I love the feeling of suspense that comes before important matches. A part of the excitement is lost in knowing that what happens in the ring is second to what happens in the council room. Instead of watching our favorite rikishi in a career-defining match on senshuraku clinch a promotion with a powerful uwatenage with the crowd roaring and the air overflowing with flying zabuton, we are forced to wait it out until ol’ Uchidate and crew make up their minds. Where’s the fun in that? RP: In the Nagano Winter Olympics, you saw a perfect example of how uniquely sumo is identified with the Land of the Rising Sun. As sumo is such a |
symbol
of Japan, we should recognize that their highest ranking rikishi
represent more than simply the best performers on the dohyo, that they
are ambassadors for Japan and its culture. As such ambassadors,
the ozeki and yokozuna can and should be held to a higher standard - a
standard that represents more than just a cold-hearted calculation of
wins. These two top ranks are special in another way, in that they are not relinquished easily. For most rikishi, the promotion criterion is clearly defined: Win more matches than you lose, and you go up – lose more than you win, and you go down. But for ozeki, it takes two consecutive make-koshi to cause demotion, and even then they gain re-promotion with 10 wins in the next basho – a nice hard criterion if there ever was one. Yokozuna are never demoted. These special privileges are yet another reason why promotion to these exalted ranks cannot rely on hard promotion criteria that is unyielding. Consensus building is such an imbued trait in Japanese business and society, it is perfectly natural to seek opinions from a variety of backgrounds in evaluating whether or not a rikishi has the qualities necessary to be an ambassador for one of its most conspicuous adornments. In fact, I applaud the NSK for going beyond what is normally perceived as a very insular world to gain the opinions of others when considering rikishi for promotions. Of course, like any system, it’s not perfect. Humans can and do make mistakes, and Futahaguro can be discussed as such. But humans also learn and adjust, and promotion to yokozuna was a lot more difficult after Futahaguro, as Onokuni found out soon after. He was denied promotion after a zensho yusho / |
12-3
jun-yusho. Ironically, hard promotion criteria would have
probably accelerated his promotion to yokozuna, so how would that have
helped? Hard promotion criteria could not and would not be permanent. At its worst, numerous automatic promotions would overflow the top of the banzuke, similar to many fantasy sumo games. With this, the criteria would have to be tightened, or in the case of few or no ozeki / yokozuna, it would be relaxed – all in an effort to keep the banzuke balanced. There is no doubt that this would happen. So how is that different from what we have now? It’s not. In the end, hard criteria will be anything but firm. You ask, “Where’s the consistency?” It sure won’t be found in hard criteria. Is every 14-1 the same? Is M12 Kotonishiki’s 14-1 yusho in Kyushu ’98 equivalent to sekiwake Miyabiyama’s 14-1 jun-yusho in Natsu ’06? Hardly! A different caliber of opponent was faced by each. Even for sanyaku, the presence or absence of other rikishi shades the results. One sekiwake posts 14-1 when the ozeki/yokozuna are injured or absent, while another sekiwake has the same record when they are all healthy. Hard criteria paint the world black and white while reality has many shades of gray that cannot be ignored. The current system didn’t curb any of my enthusiasm on senshuraku in Nagoya. To be fair though, I hadn’t even considered Miyabiyama as a promotion candidate as I still remember his previous performance ranked as ozeki. But I still knew both pride and promotion were on the line for Hakuho as he mounted the dohyo to face Asashoryu. I think everyone else was as excited as I was when he seemingly clinched Next |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||