|
basho), these are what would likely pop up: 1) he made his juryo
debut
in Haru 1995 -- over 11 years ago; 2) he has possibly the worst
knees in the business (Gokenzan limping down the hanamichi after a bout
is a familiar sight); and, 3) he is the highest-ranked rikishi in
Takanohana’s stable since Takanonami retired. He spent a couple of years at high
makushita and lower juryo between Natsu 2002 and Haru 2004, but has
since left upper makushita. In the Nagoya basho, he was at Sd7 and
scored a mere 4-3. Yet, he states he is aiming to get back to juryo.
With such knees, such age and such lack of competition in his stable,
that surely is a pie-in-the-sky goal. Senshuyama Finally, the remaining three high makushita rikishi with more than a spoonful of juryo experience: Sumanofuji (28, 16 juryo basho), Senshuyama (30, 25 juryo basho) and Daishodai (30, 14 juryo basho). Sumanofuji secured his eighth promotion to juryo with a good 5-2 at Ms3 in Nagoya. He is a classic example of a lower juryo/high makushita level rikishi who is too strong for upper makushita and too weak for juryo. Senshuyama was |
demoted from juryo for the first time in nine
basho after having had two chances for makuuchi promotion at J1 and
J3. He could not bounce back and suffered a 2-5 make-koshi
at Ms2 in Nagoya. Daishodai had an even more dramatic fall --
from the brink of makuuchi promotion in Hatsu 2006 (J1) to a losing
record in Natsu 2006 at Ms2. The fall was largely due to a knee injury,
so if recovery is full and quick, he should return to juryo soon,
especially since he went 5-2 at Ms6 against some strong opponents. Daishodai
Kageyama (19) competed in, barring injury, what was probably the last
makushita basho of his career in Nagoya, and shot up to juryo
convincingly with a 6-1 record at Ms1. Only Shiraishi was able to beat
him. He had only one 4-3 on his way to juryo, and for the past
three basho, his aggregate record in high makushita was
16-5while his career stats stand at 51-14. He aims to
compete successfully with a strong tachi-ai and will certainly be the
most interesting juryo rikishi in the Aki basho. Wakanoho (18) followed
Kageyama a few steps back, having decelerated a bit lately. Still, the
physically ready young rikishi continued his streak of kachi-koshi at
Ms7 even after an uncharacteristic 1-3 start in Nagoya. His sumo relies
a lot on power turns utilizing his long reach, but he certainly needs a lot of training outside his own
stable to keep an upward development curve, considering that he is
rather lonely, quality-wise, in Magaki-beya. Former makuuchi Gojoro exclaimed “He should be a sekitori in 2 years”
|
when he first saw the then 16-year-old Magaki recruit. Gojoro’s educated guess is close to becoming a reality. Ikioi (19) was featured in last issue’s article. He is currently the only real hope of Isenoumi-beya and just had his second appearance in makushita. At Ms35 he suffered a 3-4 losing record with no wins against truly strong foes. He should recover, though, and, after a little seasoning, he can enter high makushita and bring his content-rich sumo more into the spotlight. Possessing one of the best sumo physiques to build upon, Ikioi’s future looks promising. Shibuya (19) is also blessed with a robust sumo body and real athletic abilities. With his 174kg (384 lbs) body, he already has plenty of muscle and a fearsome forward charge. The main problem might be his immaturity. There seems to be something naive and childish about him, almost as if he were a rikishi that is now allowed to “play and eat without worries”, only later to be put through a more demanding training program. Of course, that is pure speculation but he did “suddenly” have a 10-bout losing streak. However, he regained a solid foothold in Nagoya at Ms47, with a fine 5-2 record. Mongolian Arawashi (19) has been riddled with injuries. He has had full or partial absence in three of the last four basho and will be back in sandanme for the September basho after a 2-2-3 at Ms57. He is a good technical and athletic rikishi, but his injury history at only age 19, does not exactly portend the best prospects for a prosperous Next |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||