|
Elevator Ride |
end of one’s career to be eliminated from the string. The Longevity Factor makes sense when you look at the top two guys on the original list – Takanofuji and Itai. Here, Takanofuji’s EI of 10.29 was very impressive but he only competed for 33 basho. Since Itai was able to continue his string for 20 basho longer than Takanofuji, with only one drop into juryo (that at the very beginning of his string), his was certainly the more impressive elevator performance of the two. Kirinji was only 7th on the original list, but when you consider that he maintained his high ups and downs for a staggering 85 basho with only one dip into juryo, it’s hard to argue that he doesn’t deserve the bump up to 3rd place afforded by the Longevity Factor. As before, the list is ordered by the EI, but the old EI is now labeled REI (Raw Elevator Index), and so REI x LF = EI. See the updated Rules for a detailed description. Here is the All-Time Top 20 Elevator List, now adjusted for longevity. A small tweak in the Rules means that Hokutoriki has now accumulated a 30-basho qualifying string and is in 18th place all-time, but as he is currently in juryo, his EI will Next |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In
the February issue of Elevator Ride, an alternate ranking system was
introduced, based on longevity. Each rikishi’s Elevator Index
(EI) was multiplied by a Longevity Factor (LF) of 1.xx (xx being equal
to the number of basho in the rikishi’s qualifying string). The
resulting product was called the Longevity Adjusted Elevator Index
(LAEI). Most of the rikishi in the original All-Time Top 20 list
were also found in the LAEI Top 20, but their order was slightly
reshuffled based on their Longevity Factor. I mentioned that I probably would have employed the Longevity Factor from the start if only I had thought of it at that time, but that it didn’t really matter which list is used since the names on both lists were mostly the same. Now, with two months to mull it over, it’s clear that this is just silly, because what’s the point of compiling and maintaining massive amounts of data to make a list, while asserting that a different list is just as good? There is no point, and it doesn’t make much sense, so from here there will be only one list, and it will employ the Longevity Factor. |
Looking back, it does seem as if the development of the Elevator
Rikishi Rules took a rather tortuous path. With no historical baseline
though, I doubt that the ramifications of all of the original
guidelines could have been foreseen prior to the rollout. It just had
to be ‘out there’ for a while for everything to sink in. Realistically, the more intricate rules would probably never come into play for a rikishi with major elevator impact, but they are there just to cover all the bases. At this point, I think it’s about
as fair as it can be. There are still a few gritty consequences
but resolving them just creates some others so I’m inclined to let it
be. As a reminder, the intent of this study is to recognize rikishi who were able to put up large elevator numbers without sinking into juryo and below – hence the penalty assigned when doing so. At the same time, the Rules also allow one to get ‘established’ in makuuchi before beginning a qualifying string, and also allow the nearly obligatory long periods of non-makuuchi appearances at the |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|